Visit factcheckme's column >>

FACTCHECKMEHome Page

Don't bother me. I'm thinking...or playing on my blog. http://factcheckme.wordpress.com/
Add To Watchlist
Articles Posted: 55; Links Seeded: 447
Member Since: 8/2008

There's WHAT In My Canned Peaches? Del Monte Consumer Affairs Confirms It

Live Poll

Is this OK with you?

Yes, its buyer beware.
No, its false and misleading to the consumer.
I dont know.
Other.
View Results

This is not the product I am talking about, but its the closest thing to it on their website. I know better than to buy anything that says "lite." What I purchased didnt say that.

advertisement

I recently picked up some single-serving canned fruits at my local grocery store, which I thought would make a tasty addition to my lunch. The packaging said "Naturally Sweetened" and the ingredients listed "Water, Peaches, Sugar, and Natural Flavor." I am a label-reader, and this seemed to pass all my tests: gluten-free, no artificial preservatives, and no artificial sweeteners are top priority, although I also have others. And while gluten will eventually kill me, artificial sweeteners are my arch nemeses. I don't just avoid them like the plague: I am actually coming close to taking *offense* that they even exist. It would be fair to say that I was excited at the prospect of eating my childhood favorites, canned peaches and pears, with my usual fare. The cans even had a handy pop-top.

Immediately I notice a slight aftertaste. And I start to wonder what the "Natural Flavor" actually was. I looked on Del Monte's website, but this particular product was strangely missing from the roster. So, I emailed them, and asked them politely what the hell was in these peaches, anyway. No really, I was nice. No reason not to be. Here's the response I received:

"Thanks for visiting our website and for your email. In order to achieve the Calorie Reduction in this product we have replaced some of the sugar with Acesulfame Potassium and Sucralose, artificial sweeteners. I appreciate the opportunity to respond and hope this information is helpful." --Del Monte Foods Consumer Affairs

Excuse me? Since when are Splenda and Acesulfame Potassium considered "Natural Sweeteners" and what the hell "flavor" are they believed to be imparting, natural or otherwise? And what do you mean "calorie reduction?" I wasn't aware that canned fruit was a diet product. If I wanted sugarless, I would not be shopping in the canned foods aisle, at all. Sugar is in everything, or at least it used to be. Now, apparently Splenda is in everything. And someone is making an absolute killing off of this scam.

Is this acceptable packaging for this product? Has the FDA or USDA or anyone approved synthetic chemicals' use and advertisement as "natural"? Since when? Who is in charge, here?

  • 21 Votes
  • Enjoy this article? Help vote it up the 'Vine.

Back To Top

What's this?
Who's leading the conversation?
This visualization below allows you to see the impact that each user has on the current conversation. The top row contains the group of users who have had the most impact, the 2nd row the group of users who have had the 2nd most impact (et cetera). Users with similar impact are grouped together, and the average score of the group is shown to the left of the group. The author of the article is also shown on the left, in their corresponding group. Each user's score is based on the number of comments the user has made plus the number of votes their comments have received. The scores are calculated relative one another, so while their absolute value is not particularly important, their relative difference does indicate a larger difference in impact on the conversation.
55
9.1
5.8
{"commentId":8115523,"authorDomain":"factcheckme"}

i am SOOO disappointed. in myself. not entirely surprised by del monte though.

{"commentId":8115523,"threadId":"622814","contentId":"3010819","authorDomain":"factcheckme"}
  • 10 votes
Reply#1 - Thu Jul 9, 2009 8:32 AM EDT
{"commentId":8149694,"authorDomain":"factcheckme"}

now, with a photo!

{"commentId":8149694,"threadId":"622814","contentId":"3010819","authorDomain":"factcheckme"}
  • 3 votes
#1.1 - Fri Jul 10, 2009 8:53 PM EDT
Reply
{"commentId":8116018,"authorDomain":"Parenchyma"}

You should read the book Fast Food Nation. It explains in great detail about various flavoring agents, including how and why many things which you and I would consider artificial are actually labeled as "natural."

And to answer your question, yes, the FDA is quite aware of it. ;-)

{"commentId":8116018,"threadId":"622814","contentId":"3010819","authorDomain":"Parenchyma"}
  • 8 votes
Reply#2 - Thu Jul 9, 2009 9:07 AM EDT
{"commentId":8116786,"authorDomain":"Eliana"}

Also, read The Hundred Year Lie, and check out the website truthinlabeling.org. I rarely buy anything canned and I never buy anything that says "natural flavors". The food industry hides MSG and other undesirable ingredients under other names, and as 'Parenchyma' says, the FDA knows this!

{"commentId":8116786,"threadId":"622814","contentId":"3010819","authorDomain":"Eliana"}
  • 4 votes
Reply#3 - Thu Jul 9, 2009 9:56 AM EDT
{"commentId":8117955,"authorDomain":"factcheckme"}

i almost never buy canned anything. originally it was to avoid sugar, high fructose corn syrup, and most recently gluten, which is in everything. but this "naturally sweetened" thing is really over the top. i wasnt fat as a child, and i HIGHLY doubt that anyone has ever become obese from eating canned fruit, even with the sugar.

granted, since they started putting sugar and HFC in everything, we have had an explosion in our national obesity rates. but we have no idea what the repurcussions are going to be of putting splenda in everything. i suspect we are going to see an explosion of inflammatory-related diseases like crohns and irritable bowel syndrome. since inflammation makes you look fat, and crohns gives you diarrhea, i guess thats the new "weight-management" plan we have all agreed to. the net affect will be that we will be miserable, regardless of what we weigh. UGH.

{"commentId":8117955,"threadId":"622814","contentId":"3010819","authorDomain":"factcheckme"}
  • 3 votes
#3.1 - Thu Jul 9, 2009 11:03 AM EDT
{"commentId":8128931,"authorDomain":"jimmyjamm93442"}

being a crohns patient, along with my sister and dad, watch what I eat, I prefer real sugar, and corn sweeteners, bcause I know my body knows what to do with sugar, either use it as energy, or store it as fat, I avoid all diet foods, the new "flavored" waters contain fake sugar, which has an aftertaste. when I buy canned food. I look for "heavy syrup" because If I didn't want something sweet.. I'd eat a carrot or celery. also Diarrhea is not a symptom in all crohn's patients, it depends on where the constriction is.. closer to the stomach causes bloating, and closer to the end causes diarrea. I thnk bacterial balance is a key in IBD, like the new yogurts advertise. I have found yogurt helps keep me in remission...

{"commentId":8128931,"threadId":"622814","contentId":"3010819","authorDomain":"jimmyjamm93442"}
  • 2 votes
#3.2 - Thu Jul 9, 2009 8:05 PM EDT
Reply
{"commentId":8117367,"authorDomain":"susibv"}

Unless you pick it from the tree itself....or from the fruit bin............you're at the mercy of the company that packages it and sells it.

I have never canned anything except my ex-husband......so I don't know first hand.....but something tells me....it's prolly the better way to eat peaches, pears and apricots....oh my!

:)

I propose that labels start also including: "No Artificial Sweetners, Addivties or bull@!$%# Added"

{"commentId":8117367,"threadId":"622814","contentId":"3010819","authorDomain":"susibv"}
  • 2 votes
Reply#4 - Thu Jul 9, 2009 10:30 AM EDT
{"commentId":8117549,"authorDomain":"blkdoggy421"}

File it under 'genuine imitation' flavor

{"commentId":8117549,"threadId":"622814","contentId":"3010819","authorDomain":"blkdoggy421"}
  • 3 votes
Reply#5 - Thu Jul 9, 2009 10:39 AM EDT
{"commentId":8120384,"authorDomain":"defex"}

Whats the point of having labeling laws when they do not tell you what is in the product? they will have to ban the use of "sweetener" and "flavoring" and make them actually list the ingreedients.

Good luck ever getting that to happen with all the politicians in the pockets of Del monte and the other food/chemical companies.

{"commentId":8120384,"threadId":"622814","contentId":"3010819","authorDomain":"defex"}
  • 2 votes
Reply#6 - Thu Jul 9, 2009 12:52 PM EDT
{"commentId":8121228,"authorDomain":"factcheckme"}
Whats the point of having labeling laws when they do not tell you what is in the product?

whats the point of even having labels, for that matter? or, why not just have a photograph of whats inside, with absolutely no words at all on the label. you get to know what it looks like, but not whats really "in" it. thats all you are really getting on the label now, but its misleading you into thinking you are an informed consumer. it would be more fair with no words at all, if they are going to be allowed to hide the ball like this.

{"commentId":8121228,"threadId":"622814","contentId":"3010819","authorDomain":"factcheckme"}
  • 5 votes
#6.1 - Thu Jul 9, 2009 1:35 PM EDT
{"commentId":8136087,"authorDomain":"MyOpIA"}

Keep in mind that they've already discovered that some of the labels are "incorrect", cutting olive oil with soy but not noting it on the label, adding beet sugar to honey, corn syrup to maple syrup - if the FDA wasn't raking in some of the profits from the food industries corner cutting there would be a major uproar. I guess they like collecting the payoffs.

{"commentId":8136087,"threadId":"622814","contentId":"3010819","authorDomain":"MyOpIA"}
  • 5 votes
#6.2 - Fri Jul 10, 2009 9:32 AM EDT
{"commentId":8136155,"authorDomain":"factcheckme"}
if the FDA wasn't raking in some of the profits from the food industries corner cutting there would be a major uproar. I guess they like collecting the payoffs.

indeed. when sugar and HFC was in everything, i was sure someone was making a killing off of that arrangement, now even more so, as splenda is even more expensive, if not more profitable than sugar and HFC. the payoffs must be huge. its criminal, really.

{"commentId":8136155,"threadId":"622814","contentId":"3010819","authorDomain":"factcheckme"}
  • 6 votes
#6.3 - Fri Jul 10, 2009 9:36 AM EDT
{"commentId":8136240,"authorDomain":"MyOpIA"}

It's one of those situations where you see a pile on the ground. It looks like excrement, it smells like excrement... tasting it should not be the next thought that comes to mind. If there is no payoff being made by the chemical and pharmaceutical companies, then some real work should be done by the FDA to make it clear just why it looks so positively like there is.

{"commentId":8136240,"threadId":"622814","contentId":"3010819","authorDomain":"MyOpIA"}
  • 4 votes
#6.4 - Fri Jul 10, 2009 9:41 AM EDT
Reply
{"commentId":8121638,"authorDomain":"dingding"}

Gee, listen to all of the cynics. Do you really think that once a politician is elected to office that they care one bit about the people that put them in office. The fda and those other alphabet agencies are all civil service. The problem is that the meaning of of civil or service is not understood by these people.

{"commentId":8121638,"threadId":"622814","contentId":"3010819","authorDomain":"dingding"}
    Reply#7 - Thu Jul 9, 2009 1:54 PM EDT
    {"commentId":8128517,"authorDomain":"mtndude1"}

    Another example of the FDA and our government looking out for big business and not "we the people". Nobody is telling us the truth about anything.

    Have you looked in on the 8.5 billion for swine flu vaccine. Yeah right.

    {"commentId":8128517,"threadId":"622814","contentId":"3010819","authorDomain":"mtndude1"}
    • 2 votes
    Reply#8 - Thu Jul 9, 2009 7:37 PM EDT
    {"commentId":8130766,"authorDomain":"depantzd"}

    Oh, get over yourselves.

    The term "natural" has no FDA standard, it has no meaning - just a marketing ploy. Anything can be labeled "natural" with impunity and some fool will purchase and consume it for no other reason than the ink on the label. What is artificial is the silly notion that such a thing as "all natural" exists and that it could in any way influence "health". Just trendy poppycock.

    Great market opportunity, though, since a fool and his/her money are soon parted. Good for DelMonte! Anyone is welcome to refrain from buying, for any reason.

    Nobody cares about the phobias and elitist affectations of hypochondriacs who believe "all natural" is of any consequence. Why don't you ridiculous, preachy foodies pig out on an all natural steaming pile of organic fertilizer? Probably wouldn't harm you, and wouldn't taste any worse than some of the preposterous crap that's erroneously proclaimed to be "healthy".

    Us normal people will continue to thrive on the good, affordable, wholesome food that DelMonte and other professional foodmakers prepare. No fear. No brainwashing.

    {"commentId":8130766,"threadId":"622814","contentId":"3010819","authorDomain":"depantzd"}
    • 2 votes
    Reply#9 - Thu Jul 9, 2009 10:13 PM EDT
    {"commentId":8143875,"authorDomain":"Lis"}

    You get points for poetry, PR. Most people would just say "eat @!$%#" but you say "pig out on an all natural steaming pile of organic fertilizer". Nice.

    If you don't care what you eat or if you're lied to, by all means give your money to DelMonte, Monsantos, or whatever conglomerate you see fit. But don't slam others who actually worry about their nutrition.

    {"commentId":8143875,"threadId":"622814","contentId":"3010819","authorDomain":"Lis"}
    • 4 votes
    #9.1 - Fri Jul 10, 2009 3:35 PM EDT
    {"commentId":8144496,"authorDomain":"factcheckme"}
    If you don't care what you eat or if you're lied to, by all means give your money to DelMonte, Monsantos, or whatever conglomerate you see fit. But don't slam others who actually worry about their nutrition.

    its not even just a matter of "nutrition" to some of us. i am actually very sensitive to synthetic sweeteners, and could taste it immediately. although splenda doesnt make me immediately ill like aspertame and saccharine do, i believe that i had an inflammatory response to it a few years ago after about 6 months of using it, and the changes appear to be permanent. thats why i read labels, to avoid it. but apparently thats not good enough. i just cant eat processed foods, at all, because they flatly lie about whats in it.

    {"commentId":8144496,"threadId":"622814","contentId":"3010819","authorDomain":"factcheckme"}
    • 5 votes
    #9.2 - Fri Jul 10, 2009 4:06 PM EDT
    {"commentId":8145294,"authorDomain":"Lis"}

    I know where you're coming from. I've had migraines stemming from eating that crap.

    I'm seriously glad they finally went back to using sugar in Coke here in Spain. In 7up I can still taste artificial sweetener, though of course none are listed on the can as such.

    I've started cooking from scratch for a lot of dishes instead of mixes and canned goods. It's getting to the point where we are seriously considering a small farm, such is the extent of mislabeling and unnecessary chemicals and hormones in what we eat.

    {"commentId":8145294,"threadId":"622814","contentId":"3010819","authorDomain":"Lis"}
    • 3 votes
    #9.3 - Fri Jul 10, 2009 4:48 PM EDT
    {"commentId":8146289,"authorDomain":"jimmyjamm93442"}

    I agree that this is not about healty or unlealthy, natural or artificial, it's about knowing what is in what we eat, I recently tried "FUZE" fruit flavored drink, after the first drink from the horrid saccarine like aftertaste, I could tell it had "NATURAL FAKE SUGAR" tho it wasn't on the label, the low calorie count confirmed it. I don't want natural substitutes, I want the real thing, remember Jolt cola.... "all the sugar and twice the caffine" was their motto because they didn't use HFCS.. lets get to basics.. sugar comes from plant Sucose, fructose, and glutose, from , The Cane Plant, And the Sugar Beet mostly, Molasses is a sweet byproduct great for BBQ sauce, mixed with mustard for tartness, I use any of these sweeteners because I know my body chemistry was designed expressly to process these natural sugars, and think the increae in diabetics is a result of the body becoming confused by the artifical sugars,

    {"commentId":8146289,"threadId":"622814","contentId":"3010819","authorDomain":"jimmyjamm93442"}
    • 2 votes
    #9.4 - Fri Jul 10, 2009 5:39 PM EDT
    Reply
    {"commentId":8145377,"authorDomain":"ruthlessmoose"}

    Splenda is the worst invention of the last decade. GROSS!

    {"commentId":8145377,"threadId":"622814","contentId":"3010819","authorDomain":"ruthlessmoose"}
    • 5 votes
    Reply#10 - Fri Jul 10, 2009 4:52 PM EDT
    {"commentId":8149723,"authorDomain":"factcheckme"}

    agreed. its awful.

    {"commentId":8149723,"threadId":"622814","contentId":"3010819","authorDomain":"factcheckme"}
    • 5 votes
    #10.1 - Fri Jul 10, 2009 8:55 PM EDT
    {"commentId":8151534,"authorDomain":"jvillarreal"}

    It's got a funky aftertaste. It ranks up there with Olestra.

    {"commentId":8151534,"threadId":"622814","contentId":"3010819","authorDomain":"jvillarreal"}
    • 4 votes
    #10.2 - Fri Jul 10, 2009 11:19 PM EDT
    {"commentId":8154929,"authorDomain":"ruthlessmoose"}

    yes, finally someone from the land of sanity lol How do you start with sugar... chemically treat it, then end up with splenda... and think you're supposed to eat it? I think splenda is made of cancer.

    2nd half of why i hate splenda... it conquers lol.... I work at starbucks and when I put splenda in someone's drink.... even if I don't want it in MY mouth... I still taste it! It powders up ad gets in my mouth... it's like a disease lol

    {"commentId":8154929,"threadId":"622814","contentId":"3010819","authorDomain":"ruthlessmoose"}
    • 3 votes
    #10.3 - Sat Jul 11, 2009 9:43 AM EDT
    Reply
    {"commentId":8152737,"authorDomain":"MoCowgirl"}

    First rule of thumb: If you can't pronounce an ingredient don't buy the product. I bake from scratch at home, and can control to a point what is in my cakes, cookies, casseroles, pancake syrup, pancakes, biscuits, muffins. I only use real sugar and mostly real butter (expensive), but the trade off is my husband can have his brownies with peanut butter cream cheese frosting, and not be bloated, and gain weight.

    I can raise livestock, but the green thumb is not mine. Do raise or attempt to raise a few vegetables each year to have something truly fresh and pesticide free. My husband wants to put on pesticides to kill bugs, but if the bugs aren't killing the plants, I resist as long as possible. I am suspicious of organic labeling - doesn't necesssarily mean no pesticides - maybe just no "harmful" pesticides. I need to research further. The justification for higher pricing of organic is less yield because of more crop loss to bugs, but do they really mean it??? Could just be adding more to the profit margin, but would our corporate farmers do that? And those free roaming chickens, nice thought, but if they roam far in most rural areas they are coyote and hawk snacks. I raise bobwhite quail and have hawks sitting on top of the flight pens some days. The hawks are protected by fish and game in Missouri, and can't break into the pens, but make the quail mighty nervous.

    If you eat beef, it is best to buy from a local farmer/rancher without a feedlot operation. There are organic beef producers, and you have a better chance of getting what you pay for.

    I keep forgetting, not everyone has a farmer/rancher convenient, but surely there should be one within driving distance.

    It is ridiculous the time we have to spend on researching "What's for dinner?" in this country in order to have something decent to eat. This is, if we care.

    {"commentId":8152737,"threadId":"622814","contentId":"3010819","authorDomain":"MoCowgirl"}
    • 5 votes
    Reply#11 - Sat Jul 11, 2009 1:22 AM EDT
    {"commentId":8153991,"authorDomain":"kelan123-1"}

    Whenever I see the words "natural flavor" I am always confused. It is an oxymoron. If I injest something natural, then what does flavor have to do with it.

    This week I needed yogurt, plain, unsweetened. My husband bought it since I was ill. He got this huge container with huge letters that said "PLAIN'. I was racing and had zero time or reason to recheck ingredients. Since he is usually as particular with labels as I am, I used it. Several times. Then when I had my magnifying glass handy (HA, next time I'll bring it when I shop), and read the entire back of container, it had 25g of sugar, and was flavored with vanilla. This only made the condition I was using it far worse! And now I wonder if it was some creepy fake sugar sweetner.

    All hell broke loose and I had a health problem that is now a serious infection. I have alternatives I can use, but I was furious. I threw this huge thing out, so I can't say what brand it was. We have got to be extremely cost conscious, so I was mad about that too since it was beyond large.

    Now, as it develops it isn't only about the lies concerning what is actually in the container, but also the size of the lettering. The word PLAIN was gigantic. The rest was eeensy beensy.

    Going to the supermarket is one chore I absolutely hate. It seems we have to be scientists, and assume all producers are liars. Memo: Must bring magnifying glass and cell phone to call companies re: their real nomenclature for fake ingredients which can cause serious problems for many of us. I had a small problem that is now terribly painful and gross.

    Because of so-called plain yogurt. GRRRR....

    Like McCowgirl said, do we have to be researchers to fix a snack, and what about the complexities of an entire dinner?

    Oh, and whatever your name is on post #9, and whatever your name means, go suck on a lollipop made of aspertame and splenda for dessert. enjoy.

    {"commentId":8153991,"threadId":"622814","contentId":"3010819","authorDomain":"kelan123-1"}
    • 5 votes
    Reply#12 - Sat Jul 11, 2009 7:26 AM EDT
    {"commentId":8155837,"authorDomain":"jimmyjamm93442"}

    MMM, I think I just put on a few pounds hearing about Mocowgirls great home cooking, growing your own food for safe healty food adds depth to the first lady Michelle Obama's "Victory Gardens", If I were a politician I'd use it to tackle health care and the economy, lol. just food for thought, or should it be "thought for food". well now I am thinking of food, got to get my locally roasted coffee, with real sugar, Have a great day everyone

    {"commentId":8155837,"threadId":"622814","contentId":"3010819","authorDomain":"jimmyjamm93442"}
    • 2 votes
    Reply#13 - Sat Jul 11, 2009 11:07 AM EDT
    {"canLink":false,"threadId":"622814","isPrivate":false}
    Leave a Comment:
    You're in Easy Mode. If you prefer, you can use XHTML Mode instead.
    As a new user, you may notice a few temporary content restrictions. Click here for more info.
    {"threadId":"622814","contentId":"3010819"}
    Start TrackingStart Tracking
    Stop TrackingStop Tracking